linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] ioprio: rcu_read_lock/unlock protect find_task_by

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 9 Nov 2010 12:15:57 -0800
From:	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To:	Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>
Cc:	Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@...ove.SAKURA.ne.jp>,
	jaxboe@...ionio.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ioprio: rcu_read_lock/unlock protect find_task_by_vpid
 call (V2)

On Tue, Nov 09, 2010 at 12:21:24PM +0200, Sergey Senozhatsky wrote:
> Commit 4221a9918e38b7494cee341dda7b7b4bb8c04bde "Add RCU check for
> find_task_by_vpid()" introduced rcu_lockdep_assert to find_task_by_pid_ns.
> Assertion failed in sys_ioprio_get. The patch is fixing assertion
> failure in ioprio_set as well.
> 
>  kernel/pid.c:419 invoked rcu_dereference_check() without protection!
> 
>  stack backtrace:
>  Pid: 4254, comm: iotop Not tainted
>  Call Trace:
>  [<ffffffff810656f2>] lockdep_rcu_dereference+0xaa/0xb2
>  [<ffffffff81053c67>] find_task_by_pid_ns+0x4f/0x68
>  [<ffffffff81053c9d>] find_task_by_vpid+0x1d/0x1f
>  [<ffffffff811104e2>] sys_ioprio_get+0x50/0x2da
>  [<ffffffff81002182>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b
>                      
> V2: rcu critical section expanded according to comment by Paul E. McKenne:
> | Looking over the patch again, the scope of the RCU read-side critical
> | section needs to expand to cover the use of the pointer as well as the
> | call to find_task_by_vpid().

Thank you, Sergey!

Acked-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>

Jens, are you willing to take this one?

							Thanx, Paul

> Signed-off-by: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>
> 
> ---
> 
> diff --git a/fs/ioprio.c b/fs/ioprio.c
> index 748cfb9..64cd50b 100644
> --- a/fs/ioprio.c
> +++ b/fs/ioprio.c
> @@ -111,12 +111,14 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE3(ioprio_set, int, which, int, who, int, ioprio)
>  	read_lock(&tasklist_lock);
>  	switch (which) {
>  		case IOPRIO_WHO_PROCESS:
> +			rcu_read_lock();
>  			if (!who)
>  				p = current;
>  			else
>  				p = find_task_by_vpid(who);
>  			if (p)
>  				ret = set_task_ioprio(p, ioprio);
> +			rcu_read_unlock();
>  			break;
>  		case IOPRIO_WHO_PGRP:
>  			if (!who)
> @@ -200,12 +202,14 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE2(ioprio_get, int, which, int, who)
>  	read_lock(&tasklist_lock);
>  	switch (which) {
>  		case IOPRIO_WHO_PROCESS:
> +			rcu_read_lock();
>  			if (!who)
>  				p = current;
>  			else
>  				p = find_task_by_vpid(who);
>  			if (p)
>  				ret = get_task_ioprio(p);
> +			rcu_read_unlock();
>  			break;
>  		case IOPRIO_WHO_PGRP:
>  			if (!who)
> 
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/