linux-kernel - Re: [PATCHv3 2/2] ARM: imx: Add mx53 support to common msl functions.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 9 Nov 2010 23:26:45 +0100
From:	Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>
To:	Uwe Kleine-König 
	<u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>
Cc:	Dinh.Nguyen@...escale.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux@....linux.org.uk,
	amit.kucheria@...onical.com, eric@...rea.com
Subject: Re: [PATCHv3 2/2] ARM: imx: Add mx53 support to common msl
	functions.

On Tue, Nov 09, 2010 at 11:12:13PM +0100, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> > > -	if (!cpu_is_mx51())
> > > +	if (!cpu_is_mx51() || !cpu_is_mx53())
> > >  		return 0;
> > 
> > The code below runs for every SoC except i.MX51 and i.MX53. This is
> > surely not what you want.
> Hmm, for i.MX51 !cpu_is_mx53() is true, so the return 0 is always taken,
> isn't it? :-)

Gna, I remember I ran in this trap not so long time ago ;)

Sascha

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                           |                             |
Industrial Linux Solutions                 | http://www.pengutronix.de/  |
Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0    |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686           | Fax:   +49-5121-206917-5555 |
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/