[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Thu, 11 Nov 2010 10:10:33 +0100
From: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To: paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com
CC: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@...fujitsu.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
mingo@...e.hu, dipankar@...ibm.com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
mathieu.desnoyers@...ymtl.ca, josh@...htriplett.org,
niv@...ibm.com, tglx@...utronix.de, peterz@...radead.org,
rostedt@...dmis.org, Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu, dhowells@...hat.com,
eric.dumazet@...il.com, darren@...art.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 11/12] rcu: fix race condition in synchronize_sched_expedited()
Hello, Paul, Lai.
On 11/11/2010 05:20 AM, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 04:56:32PM +0800, Lai Jiangshan wrote:
>> On 11/09/2010 09:26 PM, Tejun Heo wrote:
>>> Hello, Paul.
>>>
>>>
>>> How about something like the following? It's slightly bigger but I
>>> think it's a bit easier to understand. Thanks.
>>
>> Hello, Paul, Tejun,
>>
>> I think this approach is good and much better when several tasks
>> call synchronize_sched_expedited() at the same time.
>
> I am becoming more comfortable with it as well. Tejun, what kind of
> testing did you do? Lai, could you please run it on your systems?
I just compile tested it (so no SOB). Please feel free to take it and
shape it into a proper patch. Oh, I think we can drop both mb()'s at
the top and bottom as both atomic_inc_return() and atomic_cmpxchg()
imply full memory barrier.
Thanks.
--
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists