linux-kernel - Re: Forked android kernel development from linux kernel mainline

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 10 Nov 2010 16:47:30 -0800
From:	Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
To:	Roland Dreier <rdreier@...co.com>
Cc:	Arnaud Lacombe <lacombar@...il.com>,
	Anca Emanuel <anca.emanuel@...il.com>,
	Elvis Dowson <elvis.dowson@....com>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Forked android kernel development from linux kernel mainline

On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 04:33:38PM -0800, Roland Dreier wrote:
>  > Isn't the openwrt stuff just drivers and some arch specific code?
>  > Nothing that is core infrastructure, and nothing preventing them from
>  > submitting the drivers and arch code if they want to, right?
> 
> Actually openwrt has some core infrastructure for managing (ethernet)
> switches as extra-fancy multiport PHYs.  That means that all the drivers
> in openwrt for the typical 5-8 port switches in home routers don't
> really apply to mainline.

Why can't we merge that core infrastructure as well?  Has it been
rejected for any specific reasons?

thanks,

greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/