[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Thu, 11 Nov 2010 06:29:01 -0800
From: "Bounine, Alexandre" <Alexandre.Bounine@....com>
To: "Kumar Gala" <kumar.gala@...escale.com>,
"Shaohui Xie" <b21989@...escale.com>
Cc: <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, <linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH 3/4][v2] fsl_rio: move machine_check handler into machine_check_e500 & machine_check_e500mc
Kumar Gala <kumar.gala@...escale.com> wrote:
> > @@ -527,8 +535,12 @@ int machine_check_e500(struct pt_regs *regs)
>
> To deal w/Alex's comment do:
>
> machine_check_e500(...) {
>
> int ret = 0;
>
>
> > printk("Bus - Write Address Error\n");
> > if (reason & MCSR_BUS_IBERR)
> > printk("Bus - Instruction Data Error\n");
> > - if (reason & MCSR_BUS_RBERR)
> > + if (reason & MCSR_BUS_RBERR) {
> > printk("Bus - Read Data Bus Error\n");
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_RAPIDIO
> > + fsl_rio_mcheck_exception(regs);
> > +#endif
>
> make this like 'ret = fsl_rio...
>
Please, place it in the beginning of the machine_check_e500[mc](...) as
well to avoid any 'printk' if RIO exception was handled properly.
Alex.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists