linux-kernel - Re: [lm-sensors] Location for thermal drivers

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 12 Nov 2010 13:53:50 -0800
From:	Phil Pokorny <ppokorny@...guincomputing.com>
To:	guenter.roeck@...csson.com
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
	lm-sensors@...sensors.org
Subject: Re: [lm-sensors] Location for thermal drivers

On Fri, Nov 12, 2010 at 12:33 PM, Guenter Roeck
<guenter.roeck@...csson.com> wrote:
> I think a better location for the driver would be drivers/thermal.
> drivers/hwmon is not really a good fit, since hwmon support for thermal
> drivers is optional. Potential problem with drivers/thermal is that
> there are no thermal drivers in there (yet), and there does not seem to
> be a maintainer.

What is the difference between a "thermal" sensor and a "temperature"
sensor?  Aren't they the same thing?

Why does drivers/thermal exist if there are no drivers in it and no maintainer?

Phil P.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/