linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 03/20] x86/ticketlock: Use C for __ticket_spin

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sat, 13 Nov 2010 18:05:27 +0800
From:	Américo Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>
To:	Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>
Cc:	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Nick Piggin <npiggin@...e.de>,
	Jan Beulich <JBeulich@...ell.com>, Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>,
	Xen-devel <xen-devel@...ts.xensource.com>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
	Linux Virtualization <virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
	Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy.fitzhardinge@...rix.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/20] x86/ticketlock: Use C for __ticket_spin_unlock

On Wed, Nov 03, 2010 at 10:59:44AM -0400, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
>  * On PPro SMP or if we are using OOSTORE, we use a locked operation to unlock
>  * (PPro errata 66, 92)
>  */
>-# define UNLOCK_LOCK_PREFIX LOCK_PREFIX
>+static __always_inline void __ticket_unlock_release(struct arch_spinlock *lock)
>+{
>+	if (sizeof(lock->tickets.head) == sizeof(u8))
>+		asm (LOCK_PREFIX "incb %0"
>+		     : "+m" (lock->tickets.head) : : "memory");
>+	else
>+		asm (LOCK_PREFIX "incw %0"
>+		     : "+m" (lock->tickets.head) : : "memory");

This 'if/else' really should be done with #ifdef, even though
the compiler may be smart enough to remove it.

>+
>+}
> #else
>-# define UNLOCK_LOCK_PREFIX
>+static __always_inline void __ticket_unlock_release(struct arch_spinlock *lock)
>+{
>+	barrier();
>+	lock->tickets.head++;
>+	barrier();

The second barrier() is not needed.

Thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/