linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] memcg: avoid "free" overflow in memcg_hierarchical_free

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 16 Nov 2010 12:47:04 +0900
From:	KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>
To:	Greg Thelen <gthelen@...gle.com>
Cc:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Balbir Singh <balbir@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Daisuke Nishimura <nishimura@....nes.nec.co.jp>,
	Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
	Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@...el.com>,
	Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@...il.com>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] memcg: avoid "free" overflow in
 memcg_hierarchical_free_pages()

On Tue,  9 Nov 2010 00:54:13 -0800
Greg Thelen <gthelen@...gle.com> wrote:

> memcg limit and usage values are stored in res_counter, as 64-bit
> numbers, even on 32-bit machines.  The "free" variable in
> memcg_hierarchical_free_pages() stores the difference between two
> 64-bit numbers (limit - current_usage), and thus should be stored
> in a 64-bit local rather than a machine defined unsigned long.
> 
> Reported-by: Daisuke Nishimura <nishimura@....nes.nec.co.jp>
> Signed-off-by: Greg Thelen <gthelen@...gle.com>

Acked-by: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/