lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Wed, 17 Nov 2010 09:30:44 +0800 From: Cypher Wu <cypher.w@...il.com> To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com> Cc: Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@...era.com>, Américo Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org> Subject: Re: Kernel rwlock design, Multicore and IGMP On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 7:31 PM, Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com> wrote: > Le lundi 15 novembre 2010 à 19:18 +0800, Cypher Wu a écrit : >> In that post I want to confirm another thing: if we join/leave on >> different cores that every call will start the timer for IGMP message >> using the same in_dev->mc_list, could that be optimized? >> > > Which timer exactly ? Is it a real scalability problem ? > > I believe RTNL would be the blocking point actually... > > > > struct in_device::mr_ifc_timer. Every time when a process join/leave a MC group, igmp_ifc_event() -> igmp_ifc_start_timer() will start the timer on the core that the system call issued, and igmp_ifc_timer_expire() will be called on that core in the bottem halt of timer interrupt. If we call join/leave on mutlicores that timers will run on all these cores, but it seems only one or two will generate IGMP message, others will only lock the list and loop throught it with nothing generated. -- Cyberman Wu http://www.meganovo.com -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists