linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH -v4 1/2] lib, Make gen

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 18 Nov 2010 09:14:46 +0800
From:	Huang Ying <ying.huang@...el.com>
To:	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc:	huang ying <huang.ying.caritas@...il.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
	"linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -v4 1/2] lib, Make gen_pool memory allocator lockless

On Wed, 2010-11-17 at 19:53 +0800, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-11-17 at 19:47 +0800, huang ying wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 6:40 PM, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> wrote:
> > > On Wed, 2010-11-17 at 10:18 +0800, Huang Ying wrote:
> > >>
> > >> cmpxchg has been used in that way by ftrace and perf for a long time. So
> > >> I agree to make it a requirement on future architecture ports.
> > >
> > > Neither mandate an architecture do this though, only that when an
> > > architecture wants to support either feature and has NMIs (not all archs
> > > have NMI equivalents) it has to be safe.
> > 
> > So we can make sure cmpxchg can be used in lock-less code on
> > architectures with perf, irq_work or ftrace enabled?
> 
> It had better, otherwise stuff is broken.

Take a look at superh architecture cmpxchg implementation. It seems that
cmpxchg is implemented with special instruction if CONFIG_GUSA_RB=y or
CONFIG_CPU_SH4A=y, otherwise it is implemented with local_irq_save. Is
it possible that superh has not PMU support if CONFIG_GUSA_RB=n and
CONFIG_CPU_SH4A=n, so that perf work properly but no NMI safe cmpxchg in
that situation?

Best Regards,
Huang Ying


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/