linux-kernel - Re: [patch] x86: avoid unnecessary smp alternatives switch during suspend/resume

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sat, 20 Nov 2010 11:31:46 -0500
From:	Ben Gamari <bgamari@...il.com>
To:	Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@...el.com>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc:	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [patch] x86: avoid unnecessary smp alternatives switch during suspend/resume

On Fri, 19 Nov 2010 16:09:24 -0800, Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@...el.com> wrote:
> During suspend, we disable all the non boot cpus. And during resume we bring
> them all back again. So no need to do alternatives_smp_switch() in between.
> 
> This speeds up both suspend and resume paths.
> 
Do you have typical before/after values? Is the change on the order of
microseconds, hundreds of milliseconds, or somewhere in between? It
might be good to note this in the changelog.

- Ben
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/