linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/13] ACPI / PM: Rework power resources management

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Fri, 26 Nov 2010 20:26:54 +0100
From:	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
To:	sedat.dilek@...il.com
Cc:	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Matthew Garrett <mjg59@...f.ucam.org>,
	Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>,
	ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/13] ACPI / PM: Rework power resources management

On Friday, November 26, 2010, Sedat Dilek wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 25, 2010 at 9:45 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@...k.pl> wrote:
> > On Thursday, November 25, 2010, Sedat Dilek wrote:
> >> On Thu, Nov 25, 2010 at 9:29 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@...k.pl> wrote:
> >> > On Thursday, November 25, 2010, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> >> >> On Thursday, November 25, 2010, Sedat Dilek wrote:
> >> >> > On Thu, Nov 25, 2010 at 10:41 AM, Sedat Dilek
> >> >> > <sedat.dilek@...glemail.com> wrote:
> >> >> > > On Thu, Nov 25, 2010 at 10:11 AM, Sedat Dilek
> >> >> > > <sedat.dilek@...glemail.com> wrote:
> >> >> > >> Hi Rafael,
> >> >> > >>
> >> >> > [ ... ]
> >> >> > >> # grep "error:" build_linux-next_next20101124.dileks.2.log
> >> >> > >> /home/sd/src/linux-2.6/linux-2.6.37-rc3/debian/build/source_i386_none/drivers/platform/x86/fujitsu-laptop.c:692:
> >> >> > >> error: implicit declaration of function ‘acpi_bus_get_power’
> >> >> > [ ... ]
> >> >> > >
> >> >> > > Guess this is conflicting with your patch
> >> >> > > "12-13-ACPI-PM-Drop-acpi_bus_get_power.patch".
> >> >> > >
> >> >> > > - Sedat -
> >> >> > >
> >> >> > > P.S.: Note to myself, add the following snippet for testing purposes:
> >> >> > >
> >> >> > > [ debian/config/i386/none/config.686 ]
> >> >> > > ...
> >> >> > > ##
> >> >> > > ## file: drivers/platform/x86/Kconfig
> >> >> > > ##
> >> >> > > # CONFIG_FUJITSU_LAPTOP is not set
> >> >> > > - EOT -
> >> >> > >
> >> >> >
> >> >> > Applied on top of linux-next (next-20101125) and running.
> >> >> >
> >> >> >      Tested-by: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@...il.com>
> >> >>
> >> >> Great, thanks a lot!
> >> >>
> >> >> I should have said the patchset is on top of the current Linus' tree.
> >> >
> >> > Actually it also breaks with the current Linus' tree, but the appended patch
> >> > should fix it.
> >> >
> >> > Thanks,
> >> > Rafael
> >> >
> >> > ---
> >> > From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@...k.pl>
> >> > Subject: Platform / x86: Make fujitsu_laptop use acpi_bus_update_power()
> >> >
> >> > Use the new function acpi_bus_update_power(), which is safer than
> >> > acpi_bus_get_power(), for getting device power state in
> >> > acpi_fujitsu_add().
> >> >
> >> > Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@...k.pl>
> >> > ---
> >> >  drivers/platform/x86/fujitsu-laptop.c |    2 +-
> >> >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >> >
> >> > Index: linux-2.6/drivers/platform/x86/fujitsu-laptop.c
> >> > ===================================================================
> >> > --- linux-2.6.orig/drivers/platform/x86/fujitsu-laptop.c
> >> > +++ linux-2.6/drivers/platform/x86/fujitsu-laptop.c
> >> > @@ -689,7 +689,7 @@ static int acpi_fujitsu_add(struct acpi_
> >> >        if (error)
> >> >                goto err_free_input_dev;
> >> >
> >> > -       result = acpi_bus_get_power(fujitsu->acpi_handle, &state);
> >> > +       result = acpi_bus_update_power(fujitsu->acpi_handle, &state);
> >> >        if (result) {
> >> >                printk(KERN_ERR "Error reading power state\n");
> >> >                goto err_unregister_input_dev;
> >> >
> >>
> >> Sorry, I crapped my own quotes.
> >> Missed to catch line #860?
> >
> > Indeed, sorry.  Updated patch is appended.
> >
> > Rafael
> >
> >
> > ---
> > From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@...k.pl>
> > Subject: Platform / x86: Make fujitsu_laptop use acpi_bus_update_power()
> >
> > Use the new function acpi_bus_update_power(), which is safer than
> > acpi_bus_get_power(), for getting device power state in
> > acpi_fujitsu_add().
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@...k.pl>
> > ---
> >  drivers/platform/x86/fujitsu-laptop.c |    4 ++--
> >  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > Index: linux-2.6/drivers/platform/x86/fujitsu-laptop.c
> > ===================================================================
> > --- linux-2.6.orig/drivers/platform/x86/fujitsu-laptop.c
> > +++ linux-2.6/drivers/platform/x86/fujitsu-laptop.c
> > @@ -689,7 +689,7 @@ static int acpi_fujitsu_add(struct acpi_
> >        if (error)
> >                goto err_free_input_dev;
> >
> > -       result = acpi_bus_get_power(fujitsu->acpi_handle, &state);
> > +       result = acpi_bus_update_power(fujitsu->acpi_handle, &state);
> >        if (result) {
> >                printk(KERN_ERR "Error reading power state\n");
> >                goto err_unregister_input_dev;
> > @@ -857,7 +857,7 @@ static int acpi_fujitsu_hotkey_add(struc
> >        if (error)
> >                goto err_free_input_dev;
> >
> > -       result = acpi_bus_get_power(fujitsu_hotkey->acpi_handle, &state);
> > +       result = acpi_bus_update_power(fujitsu_hotkey->acpi_handle, &state);
> >        if (result) {
> >                printk(KERN_ERR "Error reading power state\n");
> >                goto err_unregister_input_dev;
> >
> 
> Feel free to add for
> "Platform-x86-Make-fujitsu_laptop-use-acpi_bus_update_power.patch":
> 
>      Reported-and-Tested-by: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@...il.com>

Thanks for testing!

Rafael
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/