lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Thu, 02 Dec 2010 00:58:42 -0800
From:	Corey Ashford <cjashfor@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
	Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [BUG(?)] perf_events: combining multiple tracepoint events into
 a group produces no counts on member events

On 11/30/2010 05:00 PM, Corey Ashford wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I'm not sure that what I'm seeing is a bug, or was something intentional.
>
> If I place multiple tracepoint events into a group and measure counts of
> these events on a process, I get no counts for the tracepoint events
> other than the group leader.
>
> Is this expected behavior?
>
> It's not clear to me why this should be the case; grouping shouldn't
> have any ill effects on tracepoint events, from my understanding.
>
> I noticed this because my private version of the perf tool has the event
> group patch https://lkml.org/lkml/2010/11/24/584 as well as the patch
> which fixes the parsing of multiple tracepoint events in the same -e
> switch: https://lkml.org/lkml/2010/11/30/460
>
> When I dig into the code a bit, I find that each event opens
> successfully, so that's not the problem. If I disable the grouping, then
> I get counts for all of the tracepoint events.

False alarm.  I found a bug in my forwarded-ported version of the event 
grouping patch for perf stat.  I was setting the attr->disabled bit for 
all of the events instead of just the group leader, when forking off the 
command.

Software events, tracepoints, and hardware events all work when grouped 
now.  Sorry, I should have been more thorough in testing this on other 
types of events.  I had thought I had it working with hardware events, 
and it was, but only if I attached to an existing process, not when 
forking off a new command.  Anyway, if I had tested with hardware events 
in the same way I had tested tracepoints I would have seen the problem.

So the patch mentioned above, https://lkml.org/lkml/2010/11/24/584, has 
a bug, but since it didn't get committed, I suppose it's not a problem. 
  If anyone is still interested, I can post a v4 of that patch.

Sorry for the bother!

- Corey
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ