linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4] mmc: Make ID freq configurable

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 02 Dec 2010 16:46:22 +0530
From:	Sahitya Tummala <stummala@...eaurora.org>
To:	Hein_Tibosch <hein_tibosch@...oo.es>
Cc:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Pierre Ossman <pierre@...man.eu>, Chris Ball <cjb@...top.org>,
	Ben Nizette <bn@...sdigital.com>,
	Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
	Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...ia.com>,
	linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Matt Fleming <matt@...sole-pimps.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] mmc: Make ID freq configurable

Hi Hein Tibosch,

On Fri, 2010-09-03 at 05:34 +0800, Hein_Tibosch wrote:
> In the latest releases of the mmc driver, the freq during initialization
> is set to a fixed 400 Khz. This was reportedly too fast for several
> users. As there doesn't seem to be an ideal frequency which-works-for-all,
> Pierre suggested to let the driver try several frequencies.
> 
> This patch implements that idea. It will try mmc-initialization using
> several frequencies from an array 400, 300, 200 and 100.
> I submitted it earlier but it's now adapted to and tested with kernel
> 2.6.36-rc3.
> 
> In case SDIO is broken, it'll still try to detect SDMEM, also at different
> freqs.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Hein Tibosch <hein_tibosch@...oo.es>
> 
> ---
> diff -Nurp a/drivers/mmc/core/core.c b/drivers/mmc/core/core.c
> --- a/drivers/mmc/core/core.c	2010-08-29 23:36:04.000000000 +0800
> +++ b/drivers/mmc/core/core.c	2010-09-03 04:28:52.000000000 +0800
> @@ -907,12 +907,7 @@ static void mmc_power_up(struct mmc_host
>  	 */
>  	mmc_delay(10);
> 
> -	if (host->f_min > 400000) {
> -		pr_warning("%s: Minimum clock frequency too high for "
> -				"identification mode\n", mmc_hostname(host));
> -		host->ios.clock = host->f_min;
> -	} else
> -		host->ios.clock = 400000;
> +	host->ios.clock = host->f_init;
> 
>  	host->ios.power_mode = MMC_POWER_ON;
>  	mmc_set_ios(host);
> @@ -1404,6 +1399,8 @@ void mmc_rescan(struct work_struct *work
>  	u32 ocr;
>  	int err;
>  	unsigned long flags;
> +	int i;
> +	unsigned freqs[] = { 400000, 300000, 200000, 100000 };
> 
>  	spin_lock_irqsave(&host->lock, flags);
> 
> @@ -1443,55 +1440,64 @@ void mmc_rescan(struct work_struct *work
>  	if (host->ops->get_cd && host->ops->get_cd(host) == 0)
>  		goto out;
> 
> -	mmc_claim_host(host);
> +	for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(freqs); i++) {
> +		mmc_claim_host(host);
> 
> -	mmc_power_up(host);
> -	sdio_reset(host);
> -	mmc_go_idle(host);
> +		if (freqs[i] >= host->f_min)
> +			host->f_init = freqs[i];
> +		else if (i && freqs[i-1] <= host->f_min)
> +			goto out;
> +		else
> +			host->f_init = host->f_min;
> 
> -	mmc_send_if_cond(host, host->ocr_avail);
> +		printk ("mmc_rescan: trying %u Hz\n", host->f_init);
> +		mmc_power_up(host);
> +		sdio_reset(host);
> +		mmc_go_idle(host);
> 
> -	/*
> -	 * First we search for SDIO...
> -	 */
> -	err = mmc_send_io_op_cond(host, 0, &ocr);
> -	if (!err) {
> -		if (mmc_attach_sdio(host, ocr)) {
> -			mmc_claim_host(host);
> -			/* try SDMEM (but not MMC) even if SDIO is broken */
> -			if (mmc_send_app_op_cond(host, 0, &ocr))
> -				goto out_fail;
> +		mmc_send_if_cond(host, host->ocr_avail);
> +
> +		/*
> +		 * First we search for SDIO...
> +		 */
> +		err = mmc_send_io_op_cond(host, 0, &ocr);
> +		if (!err) {
> +			if (mmc_attach_sdio(host, ocr)) {
> +				mmc_claim_host(host);
> +				/* try SDMEM (but not MMC) even if SDIO is broken */
> +				if (mmc_send_app_op_cond(host, 0, &ocr))

In case of SDIO error, mmc_power_off() is getting called as part of
mmc_detach_bus().  Shouldn't we power up the host before checking for
SDMEM? Any comments?

> +					goto out_fail;
> +
> +				if (mmc_attach_sd(host, ocr))
> +					mmc_power_off(host);
> +			}
> +			goto out;
> +		}

Thanks,
Sahitya.
--
Sent by a consultant of the Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora
Forum.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/