linux-kernel - Re: low overhead packet capturing on linux

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 2 Dec 2010 12:49:38 -0200
From:	Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <hmh@....eng.br>
To:	Thomas Fjellstrom <thomas@...llstrom.ca>
Cc:	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: low overhead packet capturing on linux

On Tue, 30 Nov 2010, Thomas Fjellstrom wrote:
> So what I'm looking for is a very low overhead way to capture packets. I've 
> come up with a few ideas, some of which I have no idea if they'd even work.

Out-of-tree PF_RING :-(

I really wish someone would tack this problem in a way suitable for
inclusion on mainline, now that we have very good generic backend
infrastructure for such stuff (such as high-speed ring buffers).

AFAIK, what we have right now simply can't cope well with wirespeed taps
(or implement sflow-style taps with low overhead) on very fast links.

-- 
  "One disk to rule them all, One disk to find them. One disk to bring
  them all and in the darkness grind them. In the Land of Redmond
  where the shadows lie." -- The Silicon Valley Tarot
  Henrique Holschuh
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/