| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Fri, 3 Dec 2010 12:42:49 +0100 From: Vitaly Wool <vitalywool@...il.com> To: Par-Gunnar Hjalmdahl <pghatwork@...il.com> Cc: Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>, linus.walleij@...ricsson.com, linux-bluetooth@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, Marcel Holtmann <marcel@...tmann.org> Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/9] mfd: Add UART support for the ST-Ericsson CG2900. Hi Par, On Fri, Dec 3, 2010 at 10:16 AM, Par-Gunnar Hjalmdahl <pghatwork@...il.com> wrote: > 2010/10/29 Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>: > By the way, I will soon release a new patch set for CG2900 (hopefully > next week), which contains major rework. It's hard to explain > everything here and now but changes include: > - Reuse of existing HCI line discipline under /drivers/bluetooth/. > Line discipline has been modified so it is selectable from protocol if > line discipline should register to Bluetooth stack or not. So is it true that if there's the other chip with similar functionality I have to implement support for, I'll have to pretty much duplicate your line discipline driver? Isn't it better to have a new line discipline that the standard drivers (H4, LL, ...) will be applicable to? ~Vitaly -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists