linux-kernel - Re: [rfc: cpuops adv V1 0/8] Cmpxchg and xchg support for cpu ops

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sat, 04 Dec 2010 20:31:25 +0100
From:	Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To:	Pekka Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi>
CC:	Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>,
	Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>
Subject: Re: [rfc: cpuops adv V1 0/8] Cmpxchg and xchg support for cpu ops

Hello,

On 12/04/2010 08:29 PM, Pekka Enberg wrote:
> [ Sorry for the delay everyone. ]
> 
> Christoph, do you mind sending me a series that you think is stable
> enough for linux-next? The numbers are pretty impressive and I'd
> love to give them some testing locally and in linux-next.
>
> How should we coordinate the per-CPU ops patches, btw? We had
> pretty good experience with the per-cpu allocator patches where
> Tejun merged the patches in his tree and I pulled it in
> slab.git. Who handles the per-cpu ops?

I'll be happy to apply the per-cpu ops part.  Christoph, would it be
okay to apply patches from this posting?

Thanks.

-- 
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/