linux-kernel - Re: mmap to address zero with MAP_FIXED returns ENOPERM for non-root users?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sun, 5 Dec 2010 02:24:30 -0500
From:	Kyle Moffett <kyle@...fetthome.net>
To:	Eric Smith <eric@...uhaha.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: mmap to address zero with MAP_FIXED returns ENOPERM for non-root users?

On Sun, Dec 5, 2010 at 01:40, Eric Smith <eric@...uhaha.com> wrote:
> I'm doing some work with binary translation of an executable from a non-x86
> microcontroller to run in an x86 process, and need to have part of the
> memory map match that of the microcontroller.  This includes having some
> memory at virtual address zero.  I know why this isn't usually a good idea,
> and why mmap() won't give that out without MAP_FIXED.

> However, when I try an anonymous mmap() to virtual address zero with
> MAP_FIXED, I get ENOPERM unless running as superuser.

Hi Eric!

This is a specific security feature designed to reduce the security
impact of a kernel NULL-pointer dereference.  Specifically, the most
obvious vulnerability occurs if kernel code accidentally calls a NULL
function pointer or calls a function pointer through a NULL structure
pointer, but there are other ways to exploit it.  The actual exploit
is to map a page with code at address zero and then trigger the kernel
NULL-pointer-dereference, resulting in privileged execution of your
unprivileged code.

There is a sysctl tunable "vm.mmap_min_addr" that you can change to
modify this behavior, and SELinux-enabled systems can loosen this
behavior a bit, but it's not normally something you want to give to
unprivileged processes.

Since you're performing binary translation of a microcontroller, it
may be better to perform some kind of minimal memory-map translation
as a part of that.  For example, you should be able to introduce an
addition into each memory dereference operation without too much
overhead (IE: treat all microcontroller addresses as relative to a
particular "memory base address").

The Debian wiki has a pretty decent page describing the security
feature in more detail:
  http://wiki.debian.org/mmap_min_addr

Cheers,
Kyle Moffett
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/