linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/3] perf: Allow strong and weak functions in LIB

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 07 Dec 2010 17:42:58 +1100
From:	Ian Munsie <imunsie@....ibm.com>
To:	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...stprotocols.net>
Cc:	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] perf: Allow strong and weak functions in LIB_OBJS

Excerpts from Ian Munsie's message of Mon Nov 29 11:53:07 +1100 2010:
> I'm not seeing any of those warnings or errors on either of the systems
> I have been testing on (x86_64 + PPC64), but it looks like the linker is
> trying to pull in too much from the system libraries.
> 
> Can you test the below patch to see if the messages go away - it only
> applies the whole-archive flag to libperf.a, whereas before I was also
> applying it to pthread, libelf, etc.

Hey Arnaldo,

Just wondering if you got around to testing this patch?

Thanks,
-Ian
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/