| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Thu, 09 Dec 2010 16:54:44 +1100 From: Ian Munsie <imunsie@....ibm.com> To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...stprotocols.net> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu> Subject: Re: [patch 0/9] perf: Consolidate the event handling and ordering Excerpts from Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo's message of Thu Dec 09 07:24:52 +1100 2010: > Hi Ian, > > Have you had the chance of reviewing/testing this patch series > so that we know that your needs are satisfied with it? Hi Arnaldo, Sorry I didn't get around to reviewing them yesterday. Overall they look pretty good, other than the fall back issue running them the userspace tool on an unpatched kernel I mentioned. I've added my patch to enable the sorting in perf record. This time I also enabled it in perf annotate and perf diff as I realised they would also need the ordering to properly attribute the samples. I haven't added it to any other commands - some already enable ordered_samples, so we wouldn't want to enable ordering_requires_timestamps on them, and I don't think any of the remaining commands need it. Cheers, -Ian -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists