[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Sat, 11 Dec 2010 01:09:50 +0100
From: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
CC: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 03/10] workqueue: It is likely that WORKER_NOT_RUNNING
is true
On 12/11/2010 01:08 AM, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-12-07 at 10:49 +0100, Tejun Heo wrote:
>
>> Yeah, I was lost thinking about the busiest case where workers are
>> busy processing works consecutively. Usually workers are of course
>> switching in and out of idle state all the time.
>>
>> How about just dropping likely/unlikely?
>
> OK, if I just remove it, can I add your Acked-by?
Sure, then, I'll route it through my tree.
Thanks.
--
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists