linux-kernel - Re: [PATCHSET] x86: unify x86_32 and 64 NUMA init paths, take#3

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 16 Dec 2010 17:56:03 +0100 (CET)
From:	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To:	Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mingo@...hat.com, hpa@...or.com,
	x86@...nel.org, eric.dumazet@...il.com, yinghai@...nel.org,
	brgerst@...il.com, gorcunov@...il.com, penberg@...nel.org,
	shaohui.zheng@...el.com
Subject: Re: [PATCHSET] x86: unify x86_32 and 64 NUMA init paths, take#3

On Thu, 16 Dec 2010, Tejun Heo wrote:
> (cc'ing Shaohui)
> Hello, Thoams.
> 
> On 12/11/2010 02:30 PM, Tejun Heo wrote:
> > This is the third take of unify-x86_32-and-64-NUMA-init-paths
> > patchset.  Most changes from the last take[L] are to reflect comments
> > from tglx.
> > 
> > * Rebased on top of tip/x86/apic-cleanup.
> > 
> > * "x86: apic: Cleanup and simplify setup_local_APIC()" is already
> >   merged into x86/apic-cleanup and dropped from this series.
> > 
> > * Instead of repurposing apic->cpu_to_logical_apicid(), replace it
> >   with a new 32bit specific callback
> >   apic->x86_32_early_logical_apicid().
> > 
> > * For consistency, in 0012, apic->apicid_to_node() is renamed to
> >   x86_32_numa_cpu_node() and put inside CONFIG_X86_32.
> > 
> > * NULL assignments for unimplemented apic ops dropped.
> > 
> > * 0013 now explicitly describes why amd srat_detect_node() accesses
> >   __apicid_to_node[] directly.  Also, add a comment in the function
> >   noting the ugliness.
> > 
> > * Patch description updated in 0014.
> > 
> > * Other misc updates.
> 
> Do the above changes agreeable to you?  Shaohui is wondering what to
> do with the conflicts between the NUMA hotplug simulator and this
> series, so...

I was looking with hpa into it, review still in progress.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/