linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] arm: dma-mapping: move consistent_init to early

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 16 Dec 2010 18:55:06 -0800 (PST)
From:	"Saravana Kannan" <skannan@...eaurora.org>
To:	"Catalin Marinas" <catalin.marinas@....com>,
	"Russell King - ARM Linux" <linux@....linux.org.uk>
Cc:	"Saravana Kannan" <skannan@...eaurora.org>, dwalker@...eaurora.org,
	linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, "Nicolas Pitre" <nico@...vell.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	"Jeff Ohlstein" <johlstei@...eaurora.org>,
	"Tejun Heo" <tj@...nel.org>, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm: dma-mapping: move consistent_init to 
     early_initcall


> On 12 December 2010 04:58, Saravana Kannan <skannan@...eaurora.org> wrote:
>> As you and James suggested, having the NS bit set by the secure world is
>> definitely a solution that would work. But IMHO, the explicit cache
>> flush/invalidate approach keeps the design simple and easy to maintain.
>
> That is indeed an approach to the problem. But it depends on whether
> we consider the DMA API appropriate for this. We can view the secure
> world as a non-coherent agent accessing the memory and could try to
> justify the use of the DMA API in Linux.
>
> At some point we'll probably have platforms supporting cacheable DMA
> (e.g. via the ARM coherency port) and the DMA API would no longer give
> you what you need. But it is also possible that platforms with ACP
> would only have 1 or 2 devices on that port (some HD LCD controller
> for example) and the rest of devices non-coherent. In this case, we
> need to have different DMA operations depending on the bus/device (via
> get_dma_ops) and thus we can allow your scenario via dedicated DMA
> ops.

Catalin,

Looks like you agree with our approach. If that's the case, would you mind
Acking Jeff's initial patch that this thread is based on?

Russell,

Does Catalin's proposal sound acceptable to you?

Thanks,
Saravana
-- 
Sent by an employee of the Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum.


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/