linux-kernel - Re: Slow disks.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 22 Dec 2010 11:27:20 -0500
From:	Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@...hat.com>
To:	Rogier Wolff <R.E.Wolff@...Wizard.nl>
Cc:	Greg Freemyer <greg.freemyer@...il.com>,
	Bruno Prémont <bonbons@...ux-vserver.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-ide@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Slow disks.

Rogier Wolff <R.E.Wolff@...Wizard.nl> writes:

> Unquoted text below is from either me or from my friend. 
>
>
> Someone suggested we try an older kernel as if kernel 2.6.32 would not
> have this problem. We do NOT think it suddenly started with a certain
> kernel version. I was just hoping to have you kernel-guys help with
> prodding the kernel into revealing which component was screwing things
> up....
[...]
> ata3.00: ATA-8: WDC WD10EARS-00Y5B1, 80.00A80, max UDMA/133

This is an "Advanced format" drive, which, in this case, means it
internally has a 4KB sector size and exports a 512byte logical sector
size.  If your partitions are misaligned, this can cause performance
problems.

> MDstat:
>
> Personalities : [raid1] [raid6] [raid5] [raid4]
> md125 : active raid5 sdd3[5](S) sdb3[4] sda3[0] sdc3[3]
>       3903488 blocks super 1.1 level 5, 512k chunk, algorithm 2 [3/3] [UUU]
>
> md126 : active raid5 sda4[0] sdd4[3] sdc4[5](S) sdb4[4]
>       1910063104 blocks super 1.1 level 5, 512k chunk, algorithm 2
> [3/3] [UUU]
>
> md1 : active raid5 sda2[0] sdd2[3](S) sdb2[1] sdc2[4]
>       39067648 blocks super 1.2 level 5, 512k chunk, algorithm 2 [3/3]
> [3/3] [UUU]
>
> md1 : active raid5 sda2[0] sdd2[3](S) sdb2[1] sdc2[4]
>       39067648 blocks super 1.2 level 5, 512k chunk, algorithm 2 [3/3]
> [UUU]

A 512KB raid5 chunk with 4KB I/Os?  That is a recipe for inefficiency.
Again, blktrace data would be helpful.

Cheers,
Jeff
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/