| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Tue, 21 Dec 2010 22:47:30 -0800 From: Darren Hart <dvhart@...ux.intel.com> To: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@...fujitsu.com> CC: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, John Kacur <jkacur@...hat.com>, James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...e.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...il.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org> Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] futex,plist: remove debug lock assignment for plist_node On 12/21/2010 09:57 PM, Lai Jiangshan wrote: > On 12/22/2010 03:14 AM, Darren Hart wrote: >> On 12/21/2010 01:55 AM, Lai Jiangshan wrote: >>> original code use&plist_node->plist as the faked head of >>> the priority list for plist_del(), these debug locks in >>> the faked head are needed for CONFIG_DEBUG_PI_LIST. >>> >>> But now we always pass the real head to plist_del(), the debug locks >>> in plist_node will not be used, so we remove these assignments. >> >> Any reason to keep this separate from patch 1/4 ? >> > > Make the changes clearer and the patches are easier to read. > For me the purposes of patch 1/4 and 2/4 are different, > 1/4 makes the code sensible. 2/4 removes unused code. Fair enough. -- Darren Hart Yocto Linux Kernel -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists