Currently p->pi_lock already serializes p->sched_class, also put p->cpus_allowed and try_to_wake_up() under it, this prepares the way to do the first part of ttwu() without holding rq->lock. Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra --- kernel/sched.c | 37 ++++++++++++++++--------------------- 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-) Index: linux-2.6/kernel/sched.c =================================================================== --- linux-2.6.orig/kernel/sched.c +++ linux-2.6/kernel/sched.c @@ -2301,7 +2301,7 @@ void task_oncpu_function_call(struct tas #ifdef CONFIG_SMP /* - * ->cpus_allowed is protected by either TASK_WAKING or rq->lock held. + * ->cpus_allowed is protected by both rq->lock and p->pi_lock */ static int select_fallback_rq(int cpu, struct task_struct *p) { @@ -2334,7 +2334,7 @@ static int select_fallback_rq(int cpu, s } /* - * The caller (fork, wakeup) owns TASK_WAKING, ->cpus_allowed is stable. + * The caller (fork, wakeup) owns p->pi_lock, ->cpus_allowed is stable. */ static inline int select_task_rq(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, int sd_flags, int wake_flags) @@ -2450,7 +2450,8 @@ static int try_to_wake_up(struct task_st this_cpu = get_cpu(); smp_wmb(); - rq = task_rq_lock(p, &flags); + raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&p->pi_lock, flags); + rq = __task_rq_lock(p); if (!(p->state & state)) goto out; @@ -2508,7 +2509,8 @@ static int try_to_wake_up(struct task_st ttwu_stat(rq, p, cpu, wake_flags); success = 1; out: - task_rq_unlock(rq, &flags); + __task_rq_unlock(rq); + raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&p->pi_lock, flags); put_cpu(); return success; @@ -4543,6 +4545,8 @@ void rt_mutex_setprio(struct task_struct BUG_ON(prio < 0 || prio > MAX_PRIO); + lockdep_assert_held(&p->pi_lock); + rq = task_rq_lock(p, &flags); trace_sched_pi_setprio(p, prio); @@ -5150,7 +5154,6 @@ long sched_getaffinity(pid_t pid, struct { struct task_struct *p; unsigned long flags; - struct rq *rq; int retval; get_online_cpus(); @@ -5165,9 +5168,9 @@ long sched_getaffinity(pid_t pid, struct if (retval) goto out_unlock; - rq = task_rq_lock(p, &flags); + raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&p->pi_lock, flags); cpumask_and(mask, &p->cpus_allowed, cpu_online_mask); - task_rq_unlock(rq, &flags); + raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&p->pi_lock, flags); out_unlock: rcu_read_unlock(); @@ -5652,18 +5655,8 @@ int set_cpus_allowed_ptr(struct task_str unsigned int dest_cpu; int ret = 0; - /* - * Serialize against TASK_WAKING so that ttwu() and wunt() can - * drop the rq->lock and still rely on ->cpus_allowed. - */ -again: - while (task_is_waking(p)) - cpu_relax(); - rq = task_rq_lock(p, &flags); - if (task_is_waking(p)) { - task_rq_unlock(rq, &flags); - goto again; - } + raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&p->pi_lock, flags); + rq = __task_rq_lock(p); if (!cpumask_intersects(new_mask, cpu_active_mask)) { ret = -EINVAL; @@ -5691,13 +5684,15 @@ int set_cpus_allowed_ptr(struct task_str if (migrate_task(p, rq)) { struct migration_arg arg = { p, dest_cpu }; /* Need help from migration thread: drop lock and wait. */ - task_rq_unlock(rq, &flags); + __task_rq_unlock(rq); + raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&p->pi_lock, flags); stop_one_cpu(cpu_of(rq), migration_cpu_stop, &arg); tlb_migrate_finish(p->mm); return 0; } out: - task_rq_unlock(rq, &flags); + __task_rq_unlock(rq); + raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&p->pi_lock, flags); return ret; } -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/