lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Fri, 31 Dec 2010 20:18:10 -0500
From:	Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@...app.com>
To:	George Spelvin <linux@...izon.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: still nfs problems [Was: Linux 2.6.37-rc8]

On Fri, 2010-12-31 at 20:03 -0500, George Spelvin wrote: 
> > ...and your point would be that an exponentially increasing addition to
> > the existing number of tests is an acceptable tradeoff in a situation
> > where the >99.999999999999999% case is that of sane servers with no
> > looping? I don't think so...
> 
> 1) Look again; it's O(1) work per entry, or O(n) work for an n-entry
>    directory.  And O(1) space.  With very small constant factors, and
>    very little code.  The only thing exponentially increasing is the
>    interval at which you save the current cookie for future comparison.
> 2) You said it *was* a problem, so it seemed worth presenting a
>    practical solution.  If you don't think it's worth it, I'm not
>    going to disagree.  But it's not impossible, or even difficult.

Yes. I was thinking about it this morning (after coffee).

One variant on those algorithms that might make sense here is to save
the current cookie each time we see that the result of a cookie search
is a filp->f_pos offset < the current filp->f_pos offset. That means we
will in general only detect the loop after going through an entire
cycle, but that should be sufficient...

Trond

-- 
Trond Myklebust
Linux NFS client maintainer

NetApp
Trond.Myklebust@...app.com
www.netapp.com

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ