lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Mon, 03 Jan 2011 09:34:43 -0700
From:	Todd Fischer <todd.fischer@...gerun.com>
To:	Dan Carpenter <error27@...il.com>, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>,
	linux-input@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 10/32] input/tps6507x-ts: use system_wq instead of dedicated
 workqueue

Hi Dan,

Polling is only necessary because I was given brain dead hardware.  I 
was expecting updated hardware with the interrupt signal connected 
properly, but haven't received it yet.

Any reasonable hardware will not need tps6507x-ts polling.  I was under 
the impression I could only push patches that I have tested.  Since I 
haven't tested an interrupt version of the driver, I didn't include a 
patch that removes the polling and replaces it with interrupts.

I have another customer planning on using the TPS6507x chip for touch 
screen.  I expect their hardware in around 3 weeks.

Todd

On 01/03/2011 07:39 AM, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 03, 2011 at 02:49:33PM +0100, Tejun Heo wrote:
>> With cmwq, there's no reason to use a separate workqueue.  Drop
>> tps6507x_ts->wq and use system_wq instead.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo<tj@...nel.org>
>> Cc: Dmitry Torokhov<dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>
>> Cc: linux-input@...r.kernel.org
>> Cc: Dan Carpenter<error27@...il.com>
>> Cc: Todd Fischer<todd.fischer@...gerun.com>
>> ---
>> Only compile tested.  Please feel free to take it into the subsystem
>> tree or simply ack - I'll route it through the wq tree.
>>
> This is that driver that polls every 30 ms.  :/  Todd, is there no way
> to avoid this?  What was the status on that?
>
> regards,
> dan carpenter
>
>

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ