linux-kernel - linux-next: build failure after merge of the percpu tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 4 Jan 2011 15:21:05 +1100
From:	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To:	Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
	Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc:	linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: linux-next: build failure after merge of the percpu tree

Hi all,

After merging the percpu tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
allmodconfig) failed like this:

arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/therm_throt.c: In function 'intel_thermal_interrupt':
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/therm_throt.c:368: error: implicit declaration of function 'this_cpu_has'

Caused by commit 6ac0bb7148b93fb40bccba5dff06d51a3e3ea283 ("x86: use
this_cpu_has for thermal_interrupt").

this_cpu_has() does not exist anywhere except in this introduced usage.

I have used the percpu tree from next-20101231 for today.
-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell                    sfr@...b.auug.org.au
http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped