linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/2] apic: Move hypervisor detection of x2apic to hypervisor.h

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 05 Jan 2011 18:40:32 +1100
From:	Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>
To:	Sheng Yang <sheng@...ux.intel.com>
CC:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] apic: Move hypervisor detection of x2apic to hypervisor.h

On 01/05/2011 12:51 PM, Sheng Yang wrote:
> On Tuesday 04 January 2011 17:24:18 Ingo Molnar wrote:
>> * Sheng Yang <sheng@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
>>> On Wednesday 22 December 2010 02:15:44 Avi Kivity wrote:
>>>> On 12/21/2010 07:15 PM, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
>>>>> On 12/20/2010 10:18 PM, Sheng Yang wrote:
>>>>>>  Then we can reuse it for Xen later.
>>>>> You should probably get someone kvm-ish to ack this too.
>>>> Looks good to me.
>>> Ingo,
>>>
>>> Comments?
>> Acked-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
>>
>> I suspect these patches want to be carried in the Xen tree, right? Shouldnt
>> cause too bad conflicts, as long as the Xen tree is pushed after the x86
>> tree in the merge window.
> Jeremy?

Sure, I'm OK with that, but I'm on vacation until the 15th.  Konrad, can
you pick this up?

Thanks,
    J

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/