linux-kernel - Re: 2.6.37 BUG at inode.c:1616 (was Re: 2.6.37: Bug on btrfs while umount)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 10 Jan 2011 11:34:37 -0800
From:	Andy Isaacson <adi@...apodia.org>
To:	Chris Mason <chris.mason@...cle.com>
Cc:	Drunkard Zhang <gongfan193@...il.com>,
	linux-btrfs <linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org>,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: 2.6.37 BUG at inode.c:1616 (was Re: 2.6.37: Bug on btrfs while
	umount)

On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 12:08:15AM -0800, Andy Isaacson wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 06, 2011 at 08:29:12PM -0500, Chris Mason wrote:
> > > [50010.838804] ------------[ cut here ]------------
> > > [50010.838931] kernel BUG at fs/btrfs/inode.c:1616!
> > > [50010.839053] invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP
> [snip]
> > > [50010.839653] Pid: 1681, comm: btrfs-endio-wri Not tainted 2.6.37 #1
> > 
> > Could you please pull from the master branch of the btrfs unstable tree.
> > We had a late fix that is related to this.
> 
> I saw BUG at inode.c:1616 while running 2.6.37-rc6-11882-g55ec86f, I saw

Just got this again, same BUG and same stack trace.  This machine +
fs ran great for several months under approximately the same workload,
but the FS is slowly filling up; is this a regression in .37 or is the
bug a function of the FS load?

-andy
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/