linux-kernel - [PATCH 3/7] staging: usbip: vhci: give back URBs from in-flight unlink requests

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 12 Jan 2011 15:02:01 +0200
From:	Max Vozeler <max@...eler.com>
To:	gregkh@...e.de
Cc:	hirofuchi@...rs.sourceforge.net, rpjday@...shcourse.ca,
	bgmerrell@...ell.com, devel@...verdev.osuosl.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mwehby@...otticaRetail.com,
	marco@...ikam.com, Max Vozeler <max@...eler.com>
Subject: [PATCH 3/7] staging: usbip: vhci: give back URBs from in-flight unlink requests

If we never received a RET_UNLINK because the TCP
connection broke the pending URBs still need to be
unlinked and given back.

Previously processes would be stuck trying to kill
the URB even after the device was detached.

Signed-off-by: Max Vozeler <max@...eler.com>
Tested-by: Mark Wehby <MWehby@...otticaRetail.com>
---
 drivers/staging/usbip/vhci.h     |    3 +++
 drivers/staging/usbip/vhci_hcd.c |   24 +++++++++++++++++++++++-
 drivers/staging/usbip/vhci_rx.c  |   15 +++++++++------
 3 files changed, 35 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/staging/usbip/vhci.h b/drivers/staging/usbip/vhci.h
index 41a1fe5..2cfd00e 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/usbip/vhci.h
+++ b/drivers/staging/usbip/vhci.h
@@ -119,6 +119,9 @@ void rh_port_disconnect(int rhport);
 void vhci_rx_loop(struct usbip_task *ut);
 void vhci_tx_loop(struct usbip_task *ut);
 
+struct urb *pickup_urb_and_free_priv(struct vhci_device *vdev,
+					    __u32 seqnum);
+
 #define hardware		(&the_controller->pdev.dev)
 
 static inline struct vhci_device *port_to_vdev(__u32 port)
diff --git a/drivers/staging/usbip/vhci_hcd.c b/drivers/staging/usbip/vhci_hcd.c
index 5f1e2b0..3a22f65 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/usbip/vhci_hcd.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/usbip/vhci_hcd.c
@@ -808,7 +808,6 @@ static int vhci_urb_dequeue(struct usb_hcd *hcd, struct urb *urb, int status)
 	return 0;
 }
 
-
 static void vhci_device_unlink_cleanup(struct vhci_device *vdev)
 {
 	struct vhci_unlink *unlink, *tmp;
@@ -816,11 +815,34 @@ static void vhci_device_unlink_cleanup(struct vhci_device *vdev)
 	spin_lock(&vdev->priv_lock);
 
 	list_for_each_entry_safe(unlink, tmp, &vdev->unlink_tx, list) {
+		usbip_uinfo("unlink cleanup tx %lu\n", unlink->unlink_seqnum);
 		list_del(&unlink->list);
 		kfree(unlink);
 	}
 
 	list_for_each_entry_safe(unlink, tmp, &vdev->unlink_rx, list) {
+		struct urb *urb;
+
+		/* give back URB of unanswered unlink request */
+		usbip_uinfo("unlink cleanup rx %lu\n", unlink->unlink_seqnum);
+
+		urb = pickup_urb_and_free_priv(vdev, unlink->unlink_seqnum);
+		if (!urb) {
+			usbip_uinfo("the urb (seqnum %lu) was already given back\n",
+							unlink->unlink_seqnum);
+			list_del(&unlink->list);
+			kfree(unlink);
+			continue;
+		}
+
+		urb->status = -ENODEV;
+
+		spin_lock(&the_controller->lock);
+		usb_hcd_unlink_urb_from_ep(vhci_to_hcd(the_controller), urb);
+		spin_unlock(&the_controller->lock);
+
+		usb_hcd_giveback_urb(vhci_to_hcd(the_controller), urb, urb->status);
+
 		list_del(&unlink->list);
 		kfree(unlink);
 	}
diff --git a/drivers/staging/usbip/vhci_rx.c b/drivers/staging/usbip/vhci_rx.c
index 8147d72..bdbedd2 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/usbip/vhci_rx.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/usbip/vhci_rx.c
@@ -23,16 +23,14 @@
 #include "vhci.h"
 
 
-/* get URB from transmitted urb queue */
-static struct urb *pickup_urb_and_free_priv(struct vhci_device *vdev,
+/* get URB from transmitted urb queue. caller must hold vdev->priv_lock */
+struct urb *pickup_urb_and_free_priv(struct vhci_device *vdev,
 					    __u32 seqnum)
 {
 	struct vhci_priv *priv, *tmp;
 	struct urb *urb = NULL;
 	int status;
 
-	spin_lock(&vdev->priv_lock);
-
 	list_for_each_entry_safe(priv, tmp, &vdev->priv_rx, list) {
 		if (priv->seqnum == seqnum) {
 			urb = priv->urb;
@@ -63,8 +61,6 @@ static struct urb *pickup_urb_and_free_priv(struct vhci_device *vdev,
 		}
 	}
 
-	spin_unlock(&vdev->priv_lock);
-
 	return urb;
 }
 
@@ -74,9 +70,11 @@ static void vhci_recv_ret_submit(struct vhci_device *vdev,
 	struct usbip_device *ud = &vdev->ud;
 	struct urb *urb;
 
+	spin_lock(&vdev->priv_lock);
 
 	urb = pickup_urb_and_free_priv(vdev, pdu->base.seqnum);
 
+	spin_unlock(&vdev->priv_lock);
 
 	if (!urb) {
 		usbip_uerr("cannot find a urb of seqnum %u\n",
@@ -161,7 +159,12 @@ static void vhci_recv_ret_unlink(struct vhci_device *vdev,
 		return;
 	}
 
+	spin_lock(&vdev->priv_lock);
+
 	urb = pickup_urb_and_free_priv(vdev, unlink->unlink_seqnum);
+
+	spin_unlock(&vdev->priv_lock);
+
 	if (!urb) {
 		/*
 		 * I get the result of a unlink request. But, it seems that I
-- 
1.7.2.3

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/