linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: build warnings in Linus' tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 13 Jan 2011 17:06:07 -0800
From:	Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
To:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
	linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Wolfram Sang <w.sang@...gutronix.de>,
	Linus <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: build warnings in Linus' tree

On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 04:17:00PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Fri, 14 Jan 2011 11:09:52 +1100
> Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> wrote:
> 
> > drivers/net/wireless/p54/p54spi.c:642: warning: ignoring return value of 'gpio_direction_input', declared with attribute warn_unused_result
> > 
> > Introduced by commit 0fdae42d361bbb431ca0ab0efed5126a94821177 ("gpiolib:
> > annotate gpio-intialization with __must_check").
> 
> Complete brainfart - I meant to drop that patch ages ago.

Ick, yeah, that patch isn't ok to go in as-is, all of the callers need
to be fixed up first, which is what I thought we had agreed on...

thanks,

greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/