| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2011 23:03:50 +0100
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [GIT] ACPI patches for 2.6.38-merge
On Friday, January 14, 2011, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 7:50 PM, Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org> wrote:
> >
> > please pull from:
> >
> > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/lenb/linux-acpi-2.6.git release
>
> Grr. I'm bisecting now, but this seems to cause
>
> [ 1.033920] ACPI: EC: Look up EC in DSDT
> [ 1.033976] BUG: spinlock bad magic on CPU#0, swapper/1
> [ 1.034038] lock: ffffffff824353f0, .magic: 00000000, .owner:
> <none>/-1, .owner_cpu: 0
> [ 1.034100] Pid: 1, comm: swapper Not tainted 2.6.37-07310-gd73b388 #14
> [ 1.034161] Call Trace:
> [ 1.034216] [<ffffffff812482a1>] ? spin_bug+0x9c/0xa3
> [ 1.034276] [<ffffffff81248371>] ? do_raw_spin_lock+0x29/0x137
> [ 1.034337] [<ffffffff81556af5>] ? _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x49/0x53
> [ 1.034399] [<ffffffff812747f0>] ? acpi_os_acquire_lock+0x9/0xb
> [ 1.034461] [<ffffffff8128819f>] ? acpi_ex_system_wait_mutex+0x1d/0x4e
> [ 1.034522] [<ffffffff812747f0>] ? acpi_os_acquire_lock+0x9/0xb
> [ 1.034583] [<ffffffff812825bd>] ? acpi_ev_acquire_global_lock+0xaf/0x12e
> [ 1.034645] [<ffffffff81289b3e>] ? acpi_ex_acquire_mutex_object+0x39/0x63
> [ 1.034707] [<ffffffff8128992b>] ? acpi_ex_acquire_global_lock+0x24/0x46
> [ 1.034769] [<ffffffff812853ec>] ? acpi_ex_read_data_from_field+0x11c/0x160
> [ 1.034833] [<ffffffff81060e70>] ? trace_hardirqs_on+0xd/0xf
> [ 1.034893] [<ffffffff8128a29d>] ? acpi_ex_resolve_node_to_value+0x19d/0x22c
> [ 1.034956] [<ffffffff81285db7>] ? acpi_ex_resolve_to_value+0x203/0x20c
> [ 1.035018] [<ffffffff8128030e>] ? acpi_ds_evaluate_name_path+0x7b/0xf9
> [ 1.035079] [<ffffffff8127eca3>] ? acpi_ds_exec_end_op+0x9b/0x3e4
> [ 1.035140] [<ffffffff81291458>] ? acpi_ps_parse_loop+0x7b8/0x950
> [ 1.035201] [<ffffffff81290820>] ? acpi_ps_parse_aml+0x94/0x2b8
> [ 1.035261] [<ffffffff81291cae>] ? acpi_ps_execute_method+0x1c9/0x273
> [ 1.035322] [<ffffffff8128d152>] ? acpi_ns_evaluate+0xda/0x1a5
> [ 1.035382] [<ffffffff81294da6>] ? acpi_ut_evaluate_object+0x72/0x19b
> [ 1.035456] [<ffffffff81294f34>] ? acpi_ut_execute_STA+0x21/0x50
> [ 1.035528] [<ffffffff8128c998>] ? acpi_ns_get_device_callback+0x12b/0x16f
> [ 1.035602] [<ffffffff81055ebd>] ? up+0x34/0x3b
> [ 1.035671] [<ffffffff8128e978>] ? acpi_ns_walk_namespace+0xbb/0x17b
> [ 1.035744] [<ffffffff8128c86d>] ? acpi_ns_get_device_callback+0x0/0x16f
> [ 1.035817] [<ffffffff8128c856>] ? acpi_get_devices+0x61/0x78
> [ 1.035888] [<ffffffff81279059>] ? ec_parse_device+0x0/0xa0
> [ 1.035960] [<ffffffff81b3e188>] ? acpi_ec_ecdt_probe+0x107/0x1da
> [ 1.036032] [<ffffffff81295b37>] ? acpi_enable_subsystem+0x82/0x8b
> [ 1.036102] [<ffffffff81b3dce7>] ? acpi_init+0x0/0x105
> [ 1.036172] [<ffffffff81b3db38>] ? acpi_bus_init+0x2e/0x1dd
> [ 1.036244] [<ffffffff8123d58e>] ? kobject_create_and_add+0x37/0x68
> [ 1.036317] [<ffffffff81b3dd58>] ? acpi_init+0x71/0x105
> [ 1.036387] [<ffffffff810002ee>] ? do_one_initcall+0x7a/0x130
> [ 1.036459] [<ffffffff81b19ccb>] ? kernel_init+0x143/0x1c7
>
> on my sandybridge machine. I see somebody else reported it too, so
> it's not just preproduction hardware.
My bad, does the appended patch help?
Rafael
---
drivers/acpi/acpica/acglobal.h | 2 ++
drivers/acpi/acpica/evmisc.c | 2 --
drivers/acpi/acpica/utmutex.c | 1 +
3 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
Index: linux-2.6/drivers/acpi/acpica/acglobal.h
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/drivers/acpi/acpica/acglobal.h
+++ linux-2.6/drivers/acpi/acpica/acglobal.h
@@ -228,8 +228,10 @@ ACPI_EXTERN u8 acpi_gbl_global_lock_pres
*/
ACPI_EXTERN spinlock_t _acpi_gbl_gpe_lock; /* For GPE data structs and registers */
ACPI_EXTERN spinlock_t _acpi_gbl_hardware_lock; /* For ACPI H/W except GPE registers */
+ACPI_EXTERN spinlock_t _acpi_ev_global_lock_pending_lock; /* For global lock */
#define acpi_gbl_gpe_lock &_acpi_gbl_gpe_lock
#define acpi_gbl_hardware_lock &_acpi_gbl_hardware_lock
+#define acpi_ev_global_lock_pending_lock &_acpi_ev_global_lock_pending_lock
/*****************************************************************************
*
Index: linux-2.6/drivers/acpi/acpica/evmisc.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/drivers/acpi/acpica/evmisc.c
+++ linux-2.6/drivers/acpi/acpica/evmisc.c
@@ -293,8 +293,6 @@ static void ACPI_SYSTEM_XFACE acpi_ev_no
*
******************************************************************************/
static u8 acpi_ev_global_lock_pending;
-static spinlock_t _acpi_ev_global_lock_pending_lock;
-#define acpi_ev_global_lock_pending_lock &_acpi_ev_global_lock_pending_lock
static u32 acpi_ev_global_lock_handler(void *context)
{
Index: linux-2.6/drivers/acpi/acpica/utmutex.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/drivers/acpi/acpica/utmutex.c
+++ linux-2.6/drivers/acpi/acpica/utmutex.c
@@ -85,6 +85,7 @@ acpi_status acpi_ut_mutex_initialize(voi
spin_lock_init(acpi_gbl_gpe_lock);
spin_lock_init(acpi_gbl_hardware_lock);
+ spin_lock_init(acpi_ev_global_lock_pending_lock);
/* Mutex for _OSI support */
status = acpi_os_create_mutex(&acpi_gbl_osi_mutex);
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists