lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2011 11:39:21 +1030 From: Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au> To: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...ricsson.com> Cc: "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Dan Carpenter <error27@...il.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH] param: add null statement to compiled-in module params On Mon, 17 Jan 2011 06:42:13 pm Linus Walleij wrote: > On 01/17/2011 12:41 AM, Rusty Russell wrote: > > On Wed, 5 Jan 2011 10:57:04 pm Linus Walleij wrote: > > > >> Add an unused struct declaration statement requiring a > >> terminating semicolon to the compile-in case to provoke an > >> error if __MODULE_INFO() is used without the terminating > >> semicolon. Previously MODULE_ALIAS("foo") (no semicolon) > >> compiled fine if MODULE was not selected. > >> > > I really prefer the other way; make everyone use a semicolon. > > > > That's what it does. Currently the kernel allows you to > write MODULE_ALIAS("bar") sans semicolon if you > compile in the module statically... > > Or am I getting things wrong? No, I was. Sorry, I should read more carefully. Applied, thanks! Rusty. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists