lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2011 07:12:18 +0100 From: Mike Galbraith <efault@....de> To: Yong Zhang <yong.zhang0@...il.com> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, samu.p.onkalo@...ia.com, mingo@...e.hu, "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, tglx <tglx@...utronix.de>, Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org> Subject: Re: Bug in scheduler when using rt_mutex On Thu, 2011-01-20 at 13:30 +0800, Yong Zhang wrote: > On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 12:59 PM, Mike Galbraith <efault@....de> wrote: > > or the task is enqueued > > at it's last offset as usual for runnable tasks. > > But shouldn't we task the tasks as WAKEUP, through the task has been > waked on other sched_class? We don't need to play any games with it afaiks, just normalize it, and the rest is taken care of automatically. > IOW, I wonder if we should play with place_entity() at some point. If the task returns as a sleeper, place entity() will be called when it is awakened, so it's sleep credit will be clipped as usual. So vruntime can be much less than min_vruntime at class exit time, and it doesn't matter, clipping on wakeup after re-entry takes care of it.. if that's what you were thinking about. -Mike -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists