linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] ARM: mm: Regarding section when dealing with meminfo

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 21 Jan 2011 10:38:50 +0000
From:	Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>
To:	KyongHo Cho <pullip.cho@...sung.com>
Cc:	Dave Hansen <dave@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@...sung.com>,
	KeyYoung Park <keyyoung.park@...sung.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Ilho Lee <ilho215.lee@...sung.com>,
	linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: mm: Regarding section when dealing with meminfo

On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 11:12:27AM +0900, KyongHo Cho wrote:
> Since the size of section is 256 mib and NR_BANKS is defined as 8,
> no ARM system can have more RAM than 2GiB in the current implementation.
> If you want banks in meminfo not to cross sparsemem boundaries,
> we need to find another way of physical memory specification in the kernel.

There is no problem with increasing NR_BANKS.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/