| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2011 11:20:11 -0200 From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...stprotocols.net> To: Denis Kirjanov <dkirjanov@...nel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl, paulus@...ba.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] perftools: Fix build error Em Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 04:57:21PM +0800, Han Pingtian escreveu: > On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 03:22:18PM -0200, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote: > > Em Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 06:44:38PM +0300, Denis Kirjanov escreveu: > > > On 01/20/2011 02:47 PM, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > > > Wouldnt %Lu solve this in a cleaner way? > > > I think that cleaner way is to use PRIu64. > > Fuglier, definetely, but indeed, more portable, as I noticed when trying > > to build the tools on a RHEL4/Fedora3 machine, as there are people using > > such old beasts with modern kernels. > > I'll take the patch for perf/urgent, as it prevents building in .38, > > please consider going thru tools/perf and patching the other %Ld and > > %Lu instances :-) > There are also some %Lx in code, shall we change them with PRIx64? Right, one patch doing the conversion for the whole tools/perf tree would be better. Han, if you can after the patch make sure it builds in an RHEL4 machine, that would be great, Thanks, - Arnaldo -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists