linux-kernel - Re: 2.6.38-rc1: arp triggers RTNL assertion

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 21 Jan 2011 23:13:19 +0100
From:	Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc:	jamie@...ible.transient.net, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: 2.6.38-rc1: arp triggers RTNL assertion

Le vendredi 21 janvier 2011 à 13:06 -0800, David Miller a écrit :
> From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
> Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2011 19:52:56 +0100
> 
> > Here is how I fixed this, thanks again Jamie !
> > 
> > [PATCH] net: neighbour: pneigh_lookup() doesnt need RTNL
> 
> Eric, I don't think we can do this.
> 
> Fundamentally, any time a user operation changes the configuration
> of the networking, we must hold the RTNL.
> 
> Eliding the RTNL for lookups is fine, but for things that change
> state it is not.
> 
> I therefore think you'll need to rework the arp_ioctl() portions
> of the commit that introduced this regression.
> 

Hmm, I'll think about it, no problem.


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/