| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Sun, 23 Jan 2011 08:14:57 +0800 From: Jeff Chua <jeff.chua.linux@...il.com> To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl> Cc: Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>, Linux-pm mailing list <linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org>, Matthew Garrett <mjg59@...f.ucam.org> Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/11] ACPI: Fixes and cleanups related to iomaps management On Sun, Jan 23, 2011 at 3:12 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@...k.pl> wrote: > On Saturday, January 22, 2011, Jeff Chua wrote: >> 2011/1/22 Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@...k.pl>: >> > On Saturday, January 22, 2011, Jeff Chua wrote: >> >> > means that my patch [11/11] _and_ the replacement are totally wrong, because you have >> > _multiple_ NVS regions. That really helped, thanks a lot. >> >> Would it be different if I offline all CPUs before suspending to ram? >> It seems to help with suspending to disk. > > No, that doesn't matter. NVS regions are just sitting there regardless of > what happens at run time. Strange. If I didn't offline, it hanged during suspend even without thinkpad_acpi. I could see that the suspend code does the offline automatically, but executing the offline before calling suspend makes it no hanging. Jeff -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists