linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 02/11] msm: Generalize timer register mappings

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 24 Jan 2011 14:57:56 -0800
From:	Daniel Walker <dwalker@...eaurora.org>
To:	David Brown <davidb@...eaurora.org>
Cc:	linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 02/11] msm: Generalize timer register mappings

On Mon, 2011-01-24 at 14:44 -0800, David Brown wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 24 2011, Daniel Walker wrote:
> 
> > On Wed, 2011-01-19 at 12:25 -0800, David Brown wrote:
> >> +       int global_offset = 0;
> >> +
> >> +       if (cpu_is_msm7x01()) {
> >> +               msm_clocks[MSM_CLOCK_GPT].regbase = MSM_CSR_BASE;
> >> +               msm_clocks[MSM_CLOCK_DGT].regbase = MSM_CSR_BASE + 0x10;
> >> +       } else if (cpu_is_msm7x30()) {
> >> +               msm_clocks[MSM_CLOCK_GPT].regbase = MSM_CSR_BASE + 0x04;
> >> +               msm_clocks[MSM_CLOCK_DGT].regbase = MSM_CSR_BASE + 0x24;
> >> +       } else if (cpu_is_qsd8x50()) {
> >> +               msm_clocks[MSM_CLOCK_GPT].regbase = MSM_CSR_BASE;
> >> +               msm_clocks[MSM_CLOCK_DGT].regbase = MSM_CSR_BASE + 0x10;
> >> +       } else if (cpu_is_msm8x60()) {
> >> +               msm_clocks[MSM_CLOCK_GPT].regbase = MSM_TMR_BASE + 0x04;
> >> +               msm_clocks[MSM_CLOCK_DGT].regbase = MSM_TMR_BASE + 0x24;
> >> +
> >> +               /* Use CPU0's timer as the global timer. */
> >> +               global_offset = MSM_TMR0_BASE - MSM_TMR_BASE;
> >> +       } else
> >> +               BUG(); 
> >
> > Ifdef's here would be OK I think, your already using the "runtime"
> > checks ..
> 
> The point of the change is to get rid of the ifdefs so that we can
> dynamically detect which target we are on.  Yes, there are other places
> where it doesn't work, but we'll get there gradually.

I'm not suggesting you do something you can't do right now ..

For instance you could make,

#define MSM_MSM7XXX_DGT_BASE          (MSM_TMR_BASE + 0x10)

and use that instead of what you have above.

Daniel

-- 

Sent by a consultant of the Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/