linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 01/11] msm: Add CPU queries

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 25 Jan 2011 11:45:29 -0800
From:	David Brown <davidb@...eaurora.org>
To:	Daniel Walker <dwalker@...eaurora.org>
Cc:	linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 01/11] msm: Add CPU queries

On Tue, Jan 25 2011, Daniel Walker wrote:

> On Tue, 2011-01-25 at 11:17 -0800, David Brown wrote:

> I suggesting we do it across the board because consistency is a good
> thing .. It also allows us to use 8x60 when 8660 and 8960 are actually
> similar .. You can't deny that 8960 is similar to 8660 because your
> patches show some duplication due to it.

You're completely missing the point of these tests.  If _anything_ is
different, the macros need to be different.  I don't care if they're
similar, I need to know when they are different.  That is the point of
the macros.

David

-- 
Sent by an employee of the Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/