lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Wed, 26 Jan 2011 07:57:11 -0500
From:	Mimi Zohar <zohar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To:	David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
Cc:	Roberto Sassu <roberto.sassu@...ito.it>,
	linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org, keyrings@...ux-nfs.org,
	linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	jmorris@...ei.org, safford@...son.ibm.com, ramunno@...ito.it,
	tyhicks@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, kirkland@...onical.com
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH v3 5/6] encrypted-keys: add ecryptfs format support

On Wed, 2011-01-26 at 11:18 +0000, David Howells wrote:
> Roberto Sassu <roberto.sassu@...ito.it> wrote:
> 
> >  security/keys/keys_ecryptfs.c            |   81 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >  security/keys/keys_ecryptfs.h            |   30 +++++++++++
> 
> Can you rename these files please?  The 'keys' prefix is redundant.  They're
> obviously about keys, or they shouldn't be in this directory.  I'd suggest
> something like 'ecryptfs_format.[ch]'.
> 
> You might want to make a subdir here specifically for the trusted and
> encrypted keys and all their formats and move those files into it if you're
> going to have lots of formats.

We think most other encrypted key usages will be unformatted. Perhaps,
for the time being, we should wait and see before making an 'encrypted'
subdirectory. 

Mimi

> >  /*
> > + * valid_ecryptfs_desc - verify the description of a new/loaded encrypted key
> > + *
> > + * The description of a encrypted key with format 'ecryptfs' must contain
> > + * exactly 16 hexadecimal characters.
> > + *
> > + */
> > +static int valid_ecryptfs_desc(const char *ecryptfs_desc)
> > +{
> 
> I think we need an additional key type operation - one that allows you to pass
> judgement on the description to be given for a key in key_alloc().  On the
> other hand, this doesn't help here as you can't do a full check on the key
> description without the payload.
> 
> David
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-security-module" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ