linux-kernel - Re: b44 driver causes panic when using swiotlb

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 1 Feb 2011 10:07:49 -0800
From:	Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>
To:	Robert Hancock <hancockrwd@...il.com>
Cc:	Chuck Ebbert <cebbert@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: b44 driver causes panic when using swiotlb

On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 06:54:21PM -0600, Robert Hancock wrote:
> On 01/31/2011 10:36 AM, Andi Kleen wrote:
> >On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 10:54:12AM -0500, Chuck Ebbert wrote:
> >>The b44 driver is triggering this panic in swiotlb_map_page():
> >>
> >>         if (!dma_capable(dev, dev_addr, size))
> >>                 panic("map_single: bounce buffer is not DMA'ble");
> >>
> >>The kernel log says the bounce buffers are at 0xdb400000, but b44 can
> >>only do DMA to the first 1GB of memory:
> >
> >b44 needs to use GFP_DMA then and do its own custom bouncing.
> >The standard pci_map_* bounce buffering is only designed for at least
> >32bit capable devices.
> 
> That seems wrong - it's a documented API and that restriction isn'

Please read the documentation. When PCI DMA cannot handle it
it returns failure. That is what happened here.

Besides historically PCI-DMA never handled < 4GB.

> documented. Either it should comply with the request or return a
> failure if it can't accomodate it, not just blow up internally.

It does return failure, that is what breaks the driver because
it doesn't handle it.

> There's no reason the driver should have to deal with this on its
> own.

Even if swiotlb could handle it, other implementations of PCI-DMA
can not

> In this case the DMA mapping code  should really be falling back to
> GFP_DMA automatically if the IOMMU aperture is outside the DMA mask
> of the device.

No, no -- you cannot allocate memory in DMA API.  It's forbidden.
Some paths that use it cannot tolerate it.

-Andi

-- 
ak@...ux.intel.com -- Speaking for myself only
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/