lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Tue, 1 Feb 2011 21:41:24 -0500
From:	Bob Copeland <me@...copeland.com>
To:	"Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@...il.com>
Cc:	linux-wireless <linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Amod Bodas <Amod.Bodas@...eros.com>,
	Senthilkumar Balasubramanian 
	<Senthilkumar.Balasubramanian@...eros.com>,
	Sree Durbha <Sree.Durbha@...eros.com>,
	Deepak Dhamdhere <Deepak.Dhamdhere@...eros.com>,
	Xin Jin <Xin.Jin@...eros.com>
Subject: Re: Support for Android for mac80211 / cfg80211 802.11 drivers

On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 7:50 PM, Luis R. Rodriguez <mcgrof@...il.com> wrote:

>> I don't think it's good to advocate a custom driver.  They should be able
>> to use stock wpa_supplicant w/ nl80211 and put the extensions in the
>> hardware layer.
>
> Can you elaborate?

>From the wiki:

"The proper approach would be to provide a custom driver_nl80211_android.c
wrapper for the modified wpa_supplicant in Android."

I just don't think it's strictly necessary to ship a modified wpa_s.
Why is Android special when bog standard Linux gets by ok with
driver_nl80211?

-- 
Bob Copeland %% www.bobcopeland.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ