[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Wed, 02 Feb 2011 11:10:44 +0200
From: Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>
To: sedat.dilek@...il.com
CC: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@...glemail.com>,
Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@...hat.com>, tglx@...utronix.de,
mingo@...hat.com, hpa@...or.com, x86@...nel.org, riel@...hat.com,
gleb@...hat.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kvm: Fix section mismatch derived from kvm_guest_cpu_online()
On 02/02/2011 09:55 AM, Sedat Dilek wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 4, 2011 at 10:03 PM, Marcelo Tosatti<mtosatti@...hat.com> wrote:
> > On Mon, Jan 03, 2011 at 12:01:29AM +0100, Sedat Dilek wrote:
> >> > From my build.log:
> >>
> >> WARNING: arch/x86/built-in.o(.text+0x1bb74): Section mismatch in reference from the function kvm_guest_cpu_online() to the function .cpuinit.text:kvm_guest_cpu_init()
> >> The function kvm_guest_cpu_online() references
> >> the function __cpuinit kvm_guest_cpu_init().
> >> This is often because kvm_guest_cpu_online lacks a __cpuinit
> >> annotation or the annotation of kvm_guest_cpu_init is wrong.
> >>
> >> This patch fixes the warning.
> >>
> >> Tested with linux-next (next-20101231)
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Sedat Dilek<sedat.dilek@...il.com>
> >
> > Applied, thanks.
> >
> >
>
> PING!
>
> Was this patch really applied? I have it still in my patch-series.
>
It was applied to kvm.git and will find its way upstream eventually.
--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists