[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Wed, 02 Feb 2011 19:48:58 +0800
From: Thomas Chou <thomas@...ron.com.tw>
To: Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>
CC: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, nios2-dev@...c.et.ntust.edu.tw,
linux-input@...r.kernel.org, devicetree-discuss@...ts.ozlabs.org,
Walter Goossens <waltergoossens@...e.nl>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] altera_ps2: Add devicetree support
On 02/02/2011 12:31 PM, Grant Likely wrote:
>> +static const struct of_device_id altera_ps2_match[] = {
>> + { .compatible = "altr,ps2-1.0", },
>
> I thought I had seen 'altera' instead of an abbreviation being used in
> a previous patch. I don't care much whether 'altr' or 'altera' is
> used, but I'd like to know that there is consensus from the Altera
> users so that all the drivers use the same prefix.
>
We had discussed on nios2-dev mailing list, and decided to use 'altr' as
Walter suggested that it saves space.
About the documentation on dts binding, shall we have a single
altera.txt to describe all Altera related binding, and opencores.txt to
describe all OpenCores binding? Or separate file for each core in its
driver class?
- Thomas
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists