linux-kernel - Re: [patch 7/8] m68knommu: 5772: Replace private irq flow handler

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 2 Feb 2011 23:37:01 +0100 (CET)
From:	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To:	Greg Ungerer <gerg@...pgear.com>
cc:	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	Greg Ungerer <gerg@...inux.org>
Subject: Re: [patch 7/8] m68knommu: 5772: Replace private irq flow handler

On Thu, 3 Feb 2011, Greg Ungerer wrote:

> 
> Hi Thomas,
> 
> On 03/02/11 07:41, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > That handler lacks the minimal checks for action being zero etc. Keep
> > the weird flow - ack before handling - intact and call into
> > handle_simple_irq which does the right thing.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
> > Cc: Greg Ungerer <gerg@...inux.org>
> 
> Acked-by: Greg Ungerer <gerg@...inux.org>
> 
> (I can't test this change for a week or two at least, I don't
> have access to any 5272 based boards at the moment.)
> 
> Do you want me to push it through the m68knommu tree,
> or are you going to do that yourself?

If it does not conflict with your stuff, I'd prefer to push it myself,
so I can apply the depending patches as well.

Thanks,

	tglx
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/