linux-kernel - Re: [RFC][PATCH 2/6] pagewalk: only split huge pages when necessary

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 3 Feb 2011 13:46:26 -0800 (PST)
From:	David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
To:	Dave Hansen <dave@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
	Michael J Wolf <mjwolf@...ibm.com>,
	Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 2/6] pagewalk: only split huge pages when
 necessary

On Thu, 3 Feb 2011, Dave Hansen wrote:

> > > diff -puN mm/pagewalk.c~pagewalk-dont-always-split-thp mm/pagewalk.c
> > > --- linux-2.6.git/mm/pagewalk.c~pagewalk-dont-always-split-thp	2011-01-27 10:57:02.309914973 -0800
> > > +++ linux-2.6.git-dave/mm/pagewalk.c	2011-01-27 10:57:02.317914965 -0800
> > > @@ -33,19 +33,35 @@ static int walk_pmd_range(pud_t *pud, un
> > >  
> > >  	pmd = pmd_offset(pud, addr);
> > >  	do {
> > > +	again:
> > 
> > checkpatch will warn about the indent.
> > 
> > >  		next = pmd_addr_end(addr, end);
> > > -		split_huge_page_pmd(walk->mm, pmd);
> > > -		if (pmd_none_or_clear_bad(pmd)) {
> > > +		if (pmd_none(*pmd)) {
> > 
> > Not sure why this has been changed from pmd_none_or_clear_bad(), that's 
> > been done even prior to THP.
> 
> The bad check will trigger on huge pmds.  We can not use it here.  We
> can, however, use pmd_none().  The bad check was moved below to where we
> actually dereference the pmd.
> 

Ah, right, thanks.

> > >  			if (walk->pte_hole)
> > >  				err = walk->pte_hole(addr, next, walk);
> > >  			if (err)
> > >  				break;
> > >  			continue;
> > >  		}
> > > +		/*
> > > +		 * This implies that each ->pmd_entry() handler
> > > +		 * needs to know about pmd_trans_huge() pmds
> > > +		 */
> > 
> > Probably needs to be documented somewhere for users of pagewalk?
> 
> Probably, but we don't currently have any central documentation for it.
> Guess we could make some, or just ensure that all the users got updated.
> Any ideas where to put it other than the mm_walk struct?
> 

I think noting it where struct mm_walk is declared would be best (just a 
"/* must handle pmd_trans_huge() */" would be sufficient) although 
eventually it might be cleaner to add a ->pmd_huge_entry().
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/