linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 4/6] TTY: use appropriate printk priority level

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 3 Feb 2011 14:13:46 -0800
From:	Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
To:	Mandeep Singh Baines <msb@...omium.org>
Cc:	gregkh@...e.de, rjw@...k.pl, mingo@...hat.com,
	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/6] TTY: use appropriate printk priority level

On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 03:29:28PM -0800, Mandeep Singh Baines wrote:
> printk()s without a priority level default to KERN_WARNING. To reduce
> noise at KERN_WARNING, this patch set the priority level appriopriately
> for unleveled printks()s. This should be useful to folks that look at
> dmesg warnings closely.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Mandeep Singh Baines <msb@...omium.org>

This doesn't apply to the latest linux-next tree, care to resend it
after refreshing it?

thanks,

greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/